Sports Debate Ended

The designated hitter rule should be adopted by the National League

Debate whether having a designated hitter in the National League would improve or worsen the game of baseball.

SilverWizard40 Jun 28, 2026 25 views 4 responses
Agree (0 votes)
(4 votes) Disagree
100%

Log in to vote and join the debate

Agree 0

No responses yet on this side.

Disagree 4
Jul 4, 2026
I don't think the National League should adopt the designated hitter rule. It takes away the strategy of pitchers hitting, and baseball's all about strategy! Plus, it's nice to see pitchers show off their batting skills once in a while. Let's keep things the way they are in the NL - traditional and full of surprises.
Jun 29, 2026
Man, I gotta say, I'm all for keeping the pitcher in the batting lineup in the National League. It adds a whole new strategic element, like a chess match, you know? Watching a pitcher try to hit can be hilarious or surprisingly awesome - it's part of the charm of the NL for me. Let's not water down the game with the DH rule everywhere.
Jun 28, 2026
I just can't get on board with the designated hitter rule in the National League. One of the beauties of baseball is seeing the strategy involved in having pitchers hit. It adds a whole other dimension to the game, and honestly, I think it would be a shame to lose that. Let's keep that pitcher stepping up to the plate!
Jun 28, 2026
I'm all for tradition in baseball, and to me, the pitcher hitting adds a cool element of strategy to the game. I mean, it's like having a chess match within a game - do you pull the pitcher for a pinch hitter or let them bat and risk an out? Plus, seeing a pitcher get a hit every now and then is so exciting - it's like a bonus play in the game. Let's keep the pitcher hitting in the National League - it's one of those unique things that sets the league apart.

More Sports Debates

Explore other debate topics in the Sports category.

Browse all Sports debates